SkillsGraph

Systems Analysis

Transferable skill← Browse all
Practice this skill ↓

O*NET® 31.0 occupation ratings · Individual ratings date from June 2010 to August 2026. Current job demand is not available here.

Where it matters

Highest importance first

Importance and level are original source rating values. Scale ranges are not included here; compare each only with the same rating in another row. These describe an occupation, rather than what one employer requires or what you can do.

910 total

  • Physical Therapist AidesImportance2.25Level2.12
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2023-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2023-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Printing Press OperatorsImportance2.25Level2.12
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2020-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2020-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Procurement ClerksImportance2.25Level2.38
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2022-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2022-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.183
    95% confidence interval
    2.0164–2.7336
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Roof Bolters, MiningImportance2.25Level2.00
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2017-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2017-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0
    95% confidence interval
    2–2
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2020-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2020-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Segmental PaversImportance2.25Level2.12
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2010-06-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.25
    95% confidence interval
    1.76–2.74
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2010-06-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.3504
    95% confidence interval
    1.4383–2.8117
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Self-Enrichment TeachersImportance2.25Level2.12
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2019-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2019-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2010-06-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.366
    95% confidence interval
    1.5327–2.9673
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2010-06-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.4407
    95% confidence interval
    1.0113–2.7387
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Substitute Teachers, Short-TermImportance2.25Level2.12
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2025-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2025-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.2266
    95% confidence interval
    1.6809–2.5691
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Teaching Assistants, PostsecondaryImportance2.25Level2.38
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.183
    95% confidence interval
    2.0164–2.7336
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2025-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.25
    95% confidence interval
    1.76–2.74
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2025-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.3239
    95% confidence interval
    0.9902–2.2598
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Team AssemblersImportance2.25Level2.00
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2020-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2020-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0
    95% confidence interval
    2–2
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2019-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2019-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Tree Trimmers and PrunersImportance2.25Level2.00
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2018-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2018-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0
    95% confidence interval
    2–2
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2022-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2022-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.25
    95% confidence interval
    1.26–2.24
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0
    95% confidence interval
    2–2
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Animal CaretakersImportance2.12Level1.75
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2019-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2019-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.4292–2.0708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Athletes and Sports CompetitorsImportance2.12Level2.12
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0
    95% confidence interval
    2–2
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2019-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2019-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2014-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2014-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.63–2.12
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Baggage Porters and BellhopsImportance2.12Level2.00
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2018-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2018-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0
    95% confidence interval
    2–2
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • BakersImportance2.12Level2.00
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0
    95% confidence interval
    2–2
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • BoilermakersImportance2.12Level2.00
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2025-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2025-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0
    95% confidence interval
    2–2
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2017-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2017-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Brickmasons and BlockmasonsImportance2.12Level2.12
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2018-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2018-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2015-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2015-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Correspondence ClerksImportance2.12Level2.12
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2023-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2023-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Costume AttendantsImportance2.12Level1.62
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.183
    95% confidence interval
    1.2664–1.9836
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2024-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.2266
    95% confidence interval
    1.6809–2.5691
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2024-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.3134
    95% confidence interval
    1.1358–2.3642
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • CytotechnologistsImportance2.12Level2.12
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2021-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2021-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0
    95% confidence interval
    2–2
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Disc Jockeys, Except RadioImportance2.12Level1.88
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.2266
    95% confidence interval
    1.6809–2.5691
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.3981
    95% confidence interval
    1.0947–2.6553
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Dredge OperatorsImportance2.12Level1.88
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2010-06-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.2266
    95% confidence interval
    1.6809–2.5691
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2010-06-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.3504
    95% confidence interval
    1.1883–2.5617
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2022-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2022-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.9292–2.5708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2017-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2017-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.63–2.12
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2023-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2023-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.183
    95% confidence interval
    2.0164–2.7336
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • EmbalmersImportance2.12Level2.12
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2021-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2021-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Fence ErectorsImportance2.12Level1.75
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2019-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2019-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.1637
    95% confidence interval
    1.4292–2.0708
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Floral DesignersImportance2.12Level2.00
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0
    95% confidence interval
    2–2
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Furniture FinishersImportance2.12Level2.00
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2017-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2017-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0
    95% confidence interval
    2–2
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2026-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2016-07-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2022-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2022-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0
    95% confidence interval
    2–2
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Helpers--Extraction WorkersImportance2.12Level1.88
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2018-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2018-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.63–2.12
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2020-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2020-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst
  • Histology TechniciansImportance2.12Level1.75
    Rating details

    Importance

    Updated
    2025-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.125
    95% confidence interval
    1.88–2.37
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    Not reported
    Rating method
    Analyst

    Level

    Updated
    2025-08-01
    Sample size
    8
    Standard error
    0.25
    95% confidence interval
    1.26–2.24
    Low precision
    No
    Not relevant
    No
    Rating method
    Analyst